Legal Opinion
Hixon v. Durbin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-708PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Before the court are several summary judgment motions in this civil rights and diversity action, which arose out of a dispute over a state employment contract. Defendants Harvey Bartle, III and Jay Waldman move for summary judgment on plaintiff’s sole remaining claim against them, which is a claim of deprivation of a property interest without due process of law in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against defendants Bartle and Waldman. Also, defendant Fred Heddinger moves…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- DuBree v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Teresa Garcia, a Minor, by Her Next Friends Max and Sandra Garcia v. Theresa Miera, J.D. Sanchez, Edward Leyba, Judi Mestas, and Felix DuranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- People of Three Mile Island v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Skevofilax v. QuigleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- L & H Sanitation, Inc. v. Lake City Sanitation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.