Commonwealth v. Sprankle
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
In this appeal appellant contends that he was not brought to trial within 180 days and accordingly, pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P., Rule 1100, the charges against him should be dismissed. Complaints were issued on July 7, 8, 17 and 23, 1974 charging appellant with possession of an offensive weapon, altering or obliterating marks of identification on a firearm, carrying a firearm without a license and violating the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act. Realizing that it would not be able to bring appellant to trial on these charges within 180 days, the Commonwealth…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BarrallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. YanceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.