Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sprankle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1976No. 1297PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

In this appeal appellant contends that he was not brought to trial within 180 days and accordingly, pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P., Rule 1100, the charges against him should be dismissed. Complaints were issued on July 7, 8, 17 and 23, 1974 charging appellant with possession of an offensive weapon, altering or obliterating marks of identification on a firearm, carrying a firearm without a license and violating the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act. Realizing that it would not be able to bring appellant to trial on these charges within 180 days, the Commonwealth…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. BarrallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. YanceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API