Legal Opinion

C. W. Hahl Co. v. Cunningham Hardy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 28, 1922No. 6827. [fn*]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

This is a suit for the sum of $3,500 instituted by appellees against appellant ; the allegation being that the sum. was-due appellees as reasonable compensation, for expert services rendered by W. P. Cunningham to appellant in ascertaining for it the-amount of income due the United States government under the existing law from the acquisition of a certain ranch property which had been sold by a certain estate to. appellant. There was an allegation that one-half the claim had been sold tb O. W. Hardy. The cause was submitted to-a jury upon one issue, the reasonableness of tbe fee charged for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. WaddillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Ruth v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. City of San Antonio v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. TeasTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McEwen v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Dave Lehr, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Morgan v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Morgan v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API