Legal Opinion
Frantz v. Wendel
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1867PublishedCited by 1 opinion
APPEAL from the Wabash Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.
— Frantz sued Wendel and Shuler on a promissory note, and sued out an attachment against the former. The affidavit is as follows:
“ The plaintiff in the above entitled action says, that the claim in this action against said defendants is for money *392due on a promissory note executed by them to C. B. Rager, and by said Hager assigned, for a valuable consideration, to said plaintiff; that the claim is just; that he believes he ought to recover the sum of $345 56, with interest thereon; that said Wendel, one of said parties, and the only one responsible, has left the State, carrying with him…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Dronillard v. WhistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868