Legal Opinion

Frantz v. Wendel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Wabash Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

— Frantz sued Wendel and Shuler on a promissory note, and sued out an attachment against the former. The affidavit is as follows:

“ The plaintiff in the above entitled action says, that the claim in this action against said defendants is for money *392due on a promissory note executed by them to C. B. Rager, and by said Hager assigned, for a valuable consideration, to said plaintiff; that the claim is just; that he believes he ought to recover the sum of $345 56, with interest thereon; that said Wendel, one of said parties, and the only one responsible, has left the State, carrying with him…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dronillard v. WhistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API