Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kovac

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2012No. 12AP360-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. On July 12, 2012, Referee Jonathan V Goodman filed an order recommending that Attorney Peter J. Kovac be declared in default, concluding that Attorney Kovac engaged in professional misconduct, and recommending that he be publicly reprimanded. Since Attorney Kovac failed to present a defense despite being given the opportunity to do so, we declare him to be in default. We further conclude that a public reprimand is an appropriate sanction for his misconduct. We also conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which are $306.41 as of August 1, 2012, should be assessed against Attorney Kovac.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. KovacWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. KovacWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. KovacWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. KovacWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API