Legal Opinion

Conneaut Lake Agricultural Ass'n v. Pittsburg Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1909No. Appeal, No. 52PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, No. 52, Jan. T., 1909, by defendant, from order of C. P. Crawford Co., May T., 1908, No. 123, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Conneaut Lake Agricultural Association v. Pittsburg Surety Company. Assumpsit on a bond. Before Bouton, P. J., specially presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 52, Jan. T., 1909, by defendant, from order of C. P. Crawford Co., May T., 1908, No. 123, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Conneaut Lake Agricultural Association v. Pittsburg Surety Company. Assumpsit on a bond. Before Bouton, P. J., specially presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Potteb,

The appellant in this case was sued, in its capacity as surety upon a contractor’s bond. In the statement of claim by plaintiff it is averred that the defendant, the Pittsburg Surety Company, had duly executed and delivered to plaintiff a bond, of which a copy was attached, and by which defendant bound itself in the sum of $3,500 “for the faithful performance on the part of L. C. Klosterman & Co., of Pittsburg, Pa., of all and every the covenants, agreements and conditions to be kept and performed by the said L. C. Klosterman & Co., contained in a certain contract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunn v. Pennsylvania Institution for the Instruction of the BlindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Borough v. OttSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Jonathan Clark & Sons Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Barclay v. DeckerhoofSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ruch v. YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Scholler Bros. v. Otto A. C. Hagen Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Eastern Steel Const. v. International FidelitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Quinn Construction, Inc. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Schwartz v. LeibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API