(PC) Banuelos v. Weiss
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAIME BANUELOS, No. 2:19-cv-2370 JAM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 R. WEISS, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant violated his Eighth Amendment rights. For the reasons 19 set forth below, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed because plaintiff has 20 failed to file an opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 21 I. Relevant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.