Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Mastin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1909PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Circuit Court., Mercer County. Action by Sarah Kaufman against T. Frank Mastin. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge:

For the possession of a drug-store room, located in Bluefield, Kaufman sued Mastin in an action of unlawful detainer. Upon the trial there was a verdict for plaintiff by direction of the court, and judgment accordingly. This writ of error is prosecuted to the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict and award a new trial.

Mastin had rented the property from one Goldstein, by a lease in writing, containing these provisions: “This lease is to continue for one year from the first day of May, 1904. The rent to be paid for said room above described is Fifty dollars per month,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McWhorter v. NorthcutTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ferguson v. MillenderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Robinson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State ex rel. McNulty v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Backus v. SternbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Moore v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. West Virginia Board of Dental Examiners v. StorchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Wyckoff v. PainterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Whalen v. ManleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API