Legal Opinion

VIRGLE v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 2002No. G029364Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM,

A defendant who is detained pursuant to a lawful arrest may be ordered to provide a fingerprint exemplar. There is no requirement for a separate probable cause determination before such an order may be made.

The magistrate compelled petitioner Anttiony Glenn Virgle to provide a fingerprint exemplar during his preliminary hearing. Identity was a key issue and, without the exemplar, the prosecution was unable to lay an adequate foundation to show that the Anthony Glenn Virgle, whose prints were displayed on a “known print card” and whose prints matched the latent print left at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hayes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. People v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Fogg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. RosalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API