VIRGLE v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM,
A defendant who is detained pursuant to a lawful arrest may be ordered to provide a fingerprint exemplar. There is no requirement for a separate probable cause determination before such an order may be made.
The magistrate compelled petitioner Anttiony Glenn Virgle to provide a fingerprint exemplar during his preliminary hearing. Identity was a key issue and, without the exemplar, the prosecution was unable to lay an adequate foundation to show that the Anthony Glenn Virgle, whose prints were displayed on a “known print card” and whose prints matched the latent print left at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hayes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Fogg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. RosalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984