Legal Opinion

Polmanteer v. Badeau

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1916Published

Actions by Osro Polmanteer and by Ora Anderson against Dyer A. Badeau and others. Heard on motions for change of venue. Motions granted.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

[1] These actions are brought against defendants, residents of Ontario county, for false imprisonment. At least one of the plaintiffs resides in Ontario county. The venue in both actions is laid in Steuben county. The actions are against public officials of Ontario county, and defendants urge that that fact entitles them to have the actions tried in that county. Code Civ. Proc. § 983, subd. 2.

[2] Within the proper time after summons and complaints had been served in these actions, defendants served answers setting up general denials, and with the answers served written demands that the place…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penniman v. Fuller & Warren Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Harmon v. Van NessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Harmon v. Van NessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API