Aldrich v. Williams
Supreme Court of Vermont
Scire Facias, on a judgment rendered upon a bond, given by the defendants to the probate court for the district of Marlboro’, in .the penal sum of $1000, dated January 11, 1825, conditioned that the defendant, Williams, who was guardian of Daniel T. Aldrich, a distracted person, should faithfully discharge his trust and duties as such guardian, according to law, and should make, and return into the registry of said probate court, a true and perfect inventory of all the…
Read the full summary
Scire Facias, on a judgment rendered upon a bond, given by the defendants to the probate court for the district of Marlboro’, in .the penal sum of $1000, dated January 11, 1825, conditioned that the defendant, Williams, who was guardian of Daniel T. Aldrich, a distracted person, should faithfully discharge his trust and duties as such guardian, according to law, and should make, and return into the registry of said probate court, a true and perfect inventory of all the estate of his said ward, within six months from the date of said bond, and render a true account of his said guardianship to…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Williams, Ch. J.
— This case comes before us on exceptions,. taken to a judgment rendered on demurrer for the plaintiff, and on exceptions taken to the decision of the court on the trial of certain issues by the jury. The action is a scire facias on a probate bond, in which a judgment for the penalty has heretofore been rendered at the suit of one Taft. To maintain this scire facias it was necessary for the plaintiff to set forth, that he had such an interest in the bond, or that he stood in that relation to Daniel T. Aldrich of whom the defendant,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Van Horn v. HannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1877
- Geipelt v. GeipeltAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919