Garnett v. Farmers' National Bank
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 111 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL PROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT. I, As to the duties of bank cashiers, see Morse on Banks and Banking, 2d ed., p. 156; Merchants’ Bank v. State Bank, 10 Wall., 604; Baldwin v. Bank of Newherry, 1 Wall., 234; United States v. City Bank of Oolumbus, 21 How., 356; Wild v. Bank of Passamaquoddy, 3 Mason, 605; Franklin Bank v. Stewart, 37 Me., 619; Sturgis v. Bank of Oircleville, 11 Ohio St., 153. It was not contemplated by the parties to the…
Read the full summary
Case 111 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL PROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT. I, As to the duties of bank cashiers, see Morse on Banks and Banking, 2d ed., p. 156; Merchants’ Bank v. State Bank, 10 Wall., 604; Baldwin v. Bank of Newherry, 1 Wall., 234; United States v. City Bank of Oolumbus, 21 How., 356; Wild v. Bank of Passamaquoddy, 3 Mason, 605; Franklin Bank v. Stewart, 37 Me., 619; Sturgis v. Bank of Oircleville, 11 Ohio St., 153. It was not contemplated by the parties to the bond sued on that King’s sureties should become insurers that such responsible duties should be faithfully performed by…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LEWIS
DELIVERED THE OPINION OE THE COURT,
October 24, 1881, Paul King, being appointed clerk of appellee, together with appellants, his sureties, executed a bond in which they covenanted in substance that he, King, as such clerk, would well and truly perform all the duties and services required of him by the board of directors, or by the by-laws of the bank or laws of the land, and faithfully fulfill all the trusts confided to him during his continuance in office as clerk. It was further covenanted that no temporary or occasional absence, of said King, clerk, from the bank should be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Home Savings Bank v. TraubeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881