Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. William G. Ostler

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1956No. 14984_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner seeks review of a decision of the Tax Court holding that there was no deficiency in respondent’s income tax for 1950. ’

In that year, Frances S. Ostler, then the taxpayer’s wife, obtained from him in a California court an interlocutory decree of divorce. The decree became final in 1951. Taxpayer and Frances filed a joint income tax return for 1950.

The Commissioner determined a deficiency on the ground that § 51(b) (5) (B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 51(b) (5) (B) 1 precludes the filing of a joint return under § 51(b) (1) of the Code…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eccles v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. EcclesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Evans v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  5. Holcomb v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Deyoe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. Robert A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue, Los Angeles District, California v. M. Robert Guggenheim, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Lawatch v. LawatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API