Legal Opinion

Pittman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This appeal was submitted December 8, 1966. Only the Attorney General has filed a brief.

I

Pittman was convicted on a trial de novo (Code 1940, T. 13, §§ 371 and 372) in the Monroe Circuit Court. The charge against him was as follows:

“The State of Alabama, by its District Attorney complains of H. Clay Pittman that within twelve months before the commencement of this prosecution he did aid encourage, or cause Larry Bell, Jackie Bell and Jimmy Bell, children under sixteen years of age, to become dependent, neglected, or delinquent, or has, by word act or omission, threats, commands…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jasper Mercantile Co. v. O'RearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Boyd v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Campbell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Beatty v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Parson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  2. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API