Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bilzerian
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 2, 1990No. CA 89-1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This action is now before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is denied.
Background
On June 9, 1989, a jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found defendant Paul A. Bilzerian guilty on nine counts which charged violations of the federal securities laws.1 Three weeks after the criminal verdicts, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought this action against Bilzerian, and others,2 for alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- PHH Corporation v. CFPBCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018