Legal Opinion

Nooe v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 4, 2006No. SC05-514Published

1Per curiam

We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Nooe v. State, 892 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted because State v. Diaz, 814 So.2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), was decided on the issue of the statute of limitations pursuant to section 812.035(10), Florida Statutes (1995), and the present case was decided on the basis of the aggregation *580provision in section 812.012(9)(c),1 Florida Statutes (2001). Accordingly, express and direct conflict does…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DiazDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Nooe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API