Legal Opinion

Stapleton Nat. Bank v. Union Trust Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 31, 1923No. 509PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTEE, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the bill of complaint on the ground that one or more indispensable parties to the controversy involved in this suit are not, and cannot be brought, before the court as parties defendant. One of the parties so claimed to be indispensable is the Marquette Iron Company, hereinafter called the Iron Company.

The material allegations of the bill, which are set forth therein with much detail, are in substance as follows:

That plaintiffs, some of whom are citizens and residents of the state of New York and some of the state of New…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Moulders Union Local No. 68Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Arkansas Southeastern R. v. Union Sawmill Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907
  4. Hannan v. SlushDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  5. Hidden v. Washington-Oregon Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelley v. QueeneyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API