Legal Opinion

Kenneweg Co. v. Finney

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 4, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (Burke, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The controversy in this case arose out of the following facts:

The Kenneweg Company, a corporation, is engaged in the grocery business at Cumberland, and Finney & Robinson are merchandise brokers at Belair. On the 2nd April, 1901, the latter wrote to the former that one of the small packers in Harford County wished to sell a thousand cases No. 3 Standard Tomatoes at 67½ cents per dozen net. On the next day the Kenneweg Company wired an acceptance of this offer and the same day Finney & Robinson sent the sales contract signed by them as brokers and accepted by the seller, J. Barnes Bailey,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. Clark's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Hooper v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. Einstein, Hirsch & Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Baker TrotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Eaton v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of Jordan Valley v. DuncanOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Taylor v. First State Bank of HawleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Cleveland Builders Supply Co. v. City Investment Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1913
  4. Taylor v. First State Bank of HawleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API