Legal Opinion
Holly DePalma v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 13, 2026No. 3:26-cv-01734Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION HOLLY DEPALMA, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § Civil Action No. 3:26-CV-1734-X NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND § CASUALTY INSURANCE § COMPANY, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Holly DePalma’s Motion to Remand. (Doc. 9). After due consideration, the Court GRANTS the motion. This case arises out of an insurance coverage dispute. DePalma argues that Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. (Nationwide) breached its contract of insurance and violated Chapters 541 and 542 of the Texas Insurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Manguno v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Richard v. Time Warner Cable Media, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2013