Legal Opinion

United States v. Salfner

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 21, 1916No. 1690PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 39119.

1Opinion of the CourtMautiN, Judge

The merchandise in this case consists of certain women’s and children’s dress goods, composed in part of wool, but in chief value of silk, which was imported into this country in November, 1913, It may be noted that the present tariff act became effective on October 4, 1913.

The present importations were assessed with duty under the provision for “women’s and children’s dress goods * * * composed wholly or in part of wool,” contained in paragraph 381 of Schedule K of the tariff act of 1909. This assessment under the act of 1909 upon merchandise imported in November, 1913, was made upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. VandegriftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Brody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Bister v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  5. Hecht & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API