Smart v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AMY, Judge.
For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Gene Smart, et al. v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, et al., 06-1414 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/4/07), 955 So.2d 263, 2007 WL 983222 the trial court’s judgment denying the exceptions of vagueness and improper cumulation of actions filed on behalf of J. Ogden Middleton is reversed. This matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment granting the exception of vagueness in compliance with La.Code Civ.P. art. 933(B) and to reserve consideration of the exception of improper cumulation of actions until the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smart v. GOLD, WEEMS, BRUSER, SUESLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smart v. GOLD, WEEMS, BRUSER, SUESLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007