Legal Opinion

Smart v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 2007No. 06-1331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Gene Smart, et al. v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, et al., 06-1414 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/4/07), 955 So.2d 263, 2007 WL 983222 the trial court’s judgment denying the exceptions of vagueness and improper cumulation of actions filed on behalf of J. Ogden Middleton is reversed. This matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment granting the exception of vagueness in compliance with La.Code Civ.P. art. 933(B) and to reserve consideration of the exception of improper cumulation of actions until the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smart v. GOLD, WEEMS, BRUSER, SUESLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smart v. GOLD, WEEMS, BRUSER, SUESLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API