Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Garner v. Gray
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1973No. State 34PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Two issues are presented in this second consideration of the Garner petition:
1. Does this court have jurisdiction, to consider petitioner’s claim that he was denied his right to a speedy trial and, if so, has he been denied such right?
2. In light of the stipulation of facts in the instant case, have the officials of the states of Wisconsin and Illinois complied with the provisions of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers ?
Speedy trial claim.
Petitioner contends the actions of both Illinois and Wisconsin officials have resulted in his being denied a speedy trial guaranteed by the Agreement on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nelson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sweeney v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Remick v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Dodson v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Blakey v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Stephen Mokone v. Peter Fenton, Warden, Rahway State Prison James R. Zazzalli, Attorney General of N.J. Christopher Dietz, Chairman, N.J. Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- State v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.