Legal Opinion

Witham v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1989No. 41A04-8802-CV-63PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Eddie G. Witham [Eddie] was severely and permanently injured when he disregarded flashing signals and the automobile he was driving was struck by a Conrail train at a crossing owned by the Norfolk and Western Railway [N & WJ. We will refer to the defendants collectively as the Railroad, when appropriate. Witham's guardian and father, Bobby G. Witham, brought suit on behalf of Eddie and for loss of services suffered by himself and Eddie's mother, Betty D. Witham, against N & W, Conrail, and members of the train's crew. After extensive discovery, the Railroad filed a Motion for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. PenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Baltimore Ohio R. Co. v. Reyher, Admx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Boswell v. LyonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. CLOUSE, ETC. v. PedenIndiana Supreme Court · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Casa D'Angelo, Inc. v. a & R REALTY CO.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Smith v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  3. Witham v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API