Johnson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Linda Pinner (Pinner) and Herman Johnson (Johnson) perfected this appeal after a jury found them guilty of possession of heroin. Appellants allege that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support an inference that they possessed the heroin, (2) the verdicts are contrary to law in failing to find them guilty of a specific offense, and (3) that references to another cause then pending denied them a fair trial.
I
The evidence most favorable to the State shows that while an all-day barbeque party was taking place at 634 West 38th Street, Indianapolis, a number of police officers with a search…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Corrao v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Martin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Feltes v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Bonds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Watt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Mills v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hutcherson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Snyder v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Grimm v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.