Legal Opinion
Gay Investment Co. v. Texas Turnpike Authority
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 9, 1974No. 18325PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAUDE WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.
Gay Investment Company appeals from a take-nothing summary judgment in its action against the Texas Turnpike Authority in which it sought money damages for breach of a covenant.
The material antecedent facts may be summarized as follows. In 1956 the Texas Turnpike Authority, acting as a condemnor *148of real property pursuant to Vernon’s Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6674v (Vernon 1969), condemned certain property owned by the Sylvan Apartment Corporation, such property to be used for construction of the Dallas-Fort Worth Turnpike. The parties to the suit entered into a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Bowers v. City of TaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- City of Farmers Branch v. Hawnco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- City of Crosbyton v. Texas-New Mexico Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Nairn v. BeanTexas Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White SettlementCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- City of Lubbock v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1977
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White Settlement, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Super Wash, Inc. v. City of White Settlement, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004