United States v. Cutting
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH, BROWNING, DUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, TRASK, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. TRASK, Circuit Judge:
Cutting and Still appeal their convictions, following jury verdicts of guilty, for mailing obscene matter and for mailing advertisements for obscene matter in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1461. Cutting was convicted on 12 separate counts; Still was convicted on 11. Each was fined separately on each count, and each was given concurrent sentences of three years’ probation on all counts of which he was convicted.
I
The material involved…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. James E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.