Legal Opinion

United States v. Cutting

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1976No. 71-2570PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH, BROWNING, DUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, TRASK, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. TRASK, Circuit Judge:

Cutting and Still appeal their convictions, following jury verdicts of guilty, for mailing obscene matter and for mailing advertisements for obscene matter in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1461. Cutting was convicted on 12 separate counts; Still was convicted on 11. Each was fined separately on each count, and each was given concurrent sentences of three years’ probation on all counts of which he was convicted.

I

The material involved…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. James E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API