Legal Opinion

State v. Reese

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 1976No. 46011, CA 5467 and 46012, CA 5490PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

In a consolidated jury trial defendant was found guilty of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207, and unlawful possession of a weapon, ORS 166.250. Initially, defendant was represented by appointed counsel, but on the day prior to trial he filed a notice of substitution of attorney. At the same time, defendant’s newly-retained attorney moved for a continuance alleging that defendant had obtained sufficient funds to retain counsel and that retained counsel had not had an opportunity to prepare for trial.

The defendant assigns as error the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. OareOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. PfliegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CrevistonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API