Miller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
Ricky Miller appeals his conviction of possession of cocaine. At his trial, he requested that the court instruct the jury on his affirmative defense of lack of knowledge that the substance he possessed was cocaine. The trial court refused to give the instruction. We reverse.
The possession of cocaine charge arose from Miller’s possession of a glass pipe which contained cocaine residue. When Miller testified in his own defense, counsel had specifically asked Miller whether he knew that cocaine was in the pipe, and Miller denied knowing of any. During the charge conference, the defense requested…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Bozeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Gregory v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Burnette v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maestas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Shelton v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- Little v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Quick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010