Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1999No. 97-35859Published

1DissentTashima, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s holding that the dispute between BNSF and Local 174 was not a labor dispute within the meaning of the Norris-LaGuardia Act (“NLGA”), thus rendering its anti-injunction provisions inapplicable. I also disagree that this record supports the issuance of a preliminary injunction under the Clayton Act. I would hold that a dispute between an employer and its subcontractor’s employees involving the issue of whether those employees would have any work at all is a labor dispute under the broad contours of the NLGA; thus, that its anti-injunction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Milk Wagon Drivers' Union, Local No. 753 v. Lake Valley Farm Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API