Legal Opinion

Slaughter v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1938No. 4 Div. 14PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The only question presented on this appeal relates to the action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial for newly’ discovered evidence.

We are persuaded defendant has not met the burden resting upon him to show due diligence, a prime requisite to the granting of such a motion for new trial. 21 Alabama and Southern Digest, New Trial, ®=3102, page 189. We have studied with care the evidence in the case, and considered same in connection with the affidavits presented at the hearing of the motion. While the trial of defendant followed in a short time his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WildmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Stephens v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Goodwin v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Ex Parte HeatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Zuck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API