Legal Opinion
Marriage of Doyle v. Doyle
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 2001No. 79A02-0103-CV-125PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Pamela M. Schafer (formerly Doyle) appeals the trial court's Order granting her ex-husband, Rick L. Doyle, more than 50% of their marital estate. Specifically, Pamela contends that none of the statutory factors supported an unequal property division in favor of Rick. Conversely, Pamela contends that she was entitled to an unequal division of the marital estate in her favor based on a personal injury settlement she received 11 years prior to marriage. Because we find that accounts established using the settlement funds were never treated as marital property and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scott v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Swinney v. SwinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Newby v. NewbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- O'Connell v. O'ConnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Wanner v. HutchcroftIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Andrew Joseph Wortkoetter v. Amy Jean WortkoetterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Dana L. Smith v. James L. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- James Ticen v. Vicki TicenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013