Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kathy Jo Taylor, a Minor, by and Through David S. Walker, Jr., Attorney at Law as Guardian Ad Litem v. James G. Ledbetter, ph.d.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 9, 1987No. 85-8354Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which RONEY, Chief Judge, and HILL, Circuit Judge, join:

The majority today holds that a state foster care caseworker, his immediate supervisor, and everyone else in the chain of supervision between the caseworker and the director of the state welfare department (including the director) can be held liable for physical injuries deliberately in*810flicted on a child by her foster parents. The majority bases its conclusion on two theories of liability. First, purporting to follow Doe v. New York City Dep’t of Social Servs., 649 F.2d…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API