Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Dinsmore

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 20, 1959No. 13,015Published

1ConcurrenceFeeguson, Judge

I concur.

While I join my associates in affirming the decision of the board of review, I prefer to set forth my views with respect to the accuracy of the questioned instruction.

The accused was found guilty of absence without leave, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, 10 USC § 886, and three specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, 10 USC § 921. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed, and we granted review on the question whether the president of the special court-martial erred in his instructions on the offense of larceny with respect to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. GloverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. EstesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API