Milliken Bros. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Separate appeals by the defendants, Jerome A. Jackson and others, from portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants The City of New York and James D. Murphy Company, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of March, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a tidal at the New York Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
This was an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon the. amount due by the city of New York to its contractor, the James D. *600Murphy Company, who was building under a contract with the city of New York the Sixty-ninth Regiment armory. The defendants appellants interposed answers setting up certain- mechanics’ liens which they claimed to have filed against the amounts due by the city to the Murphy Company. The court dismissed the claims of these defendants appellants upon the ground that their liens were not filed in time, and from the judgment entered thereon these appellants…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Milliken Bros. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Berger Manufacturing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- Milliken Bros. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913