Warren v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of theft from person and the court assessed punishment at two years confinement. § 31.03(e)(4)(B). The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Warren v. State, 784 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1989). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to deter mine whether the Court of Appeals correctly decided that the evidence was sufficient.
Officers with the Vice Squad of the Houston Police Department established surveillance for prostitution at a nightclub in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Benson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Brandon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Zanghetti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by25 opinions
- Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Westfall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- Contreras v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- SMILES v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.