Legal Opinion
Moore & Jester v. Smith Machine Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 30, 1908No. 1002PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Complaint, from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Harrell. January 15, 1908.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
1. This suit was against the firm of Moore & Jester, alleged to be composed of T. W. Jester and George B. Moore. Judgment was rendered against the partnership and also against the individual members thereof. To avoid the payment of costs, a pauper affidavit has been filed, executed by Jester, in which he alleges that on account of poverty the partnership is unable to pay the costs. There is no affidavit as to the poverty of the individual members of the partnership or as to their inability to pay the costs. Of course the pauper affidavit must be broad enough to cover all the-plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drucker & Brother v. Wellhouse & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Bedingfield & Co. v. Bates Advertising Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Standard Carbonating & Supply Co. v. Capital City GuardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
3Cited by16 opinions
- Prattes v. Southeast Ceramics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Thompson Enterprises Inc. v. CoskreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Byers v. LiebermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Brannan, Beckham & Co. v. RamsaurCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Cunningham v. Huson Ice & Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.