Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dolezal v. Carbrey

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 18, 1989No. 1 CA-CIV 9851, 1 CA-CIV 9934Published

1DissentGrant, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent because I would affirm the order of the trial court granting both defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

I differ with the majority’s interpretation of the law and facts in this case. The fundamental issue is one of the foreseeability of the injury. From the deposition testimony, it is quite clear that no one anticipated or could have anticipated that Blue would bolt under these circumstances. Both of Blue’s trainers, Brian Whaler and Mark Sheridan, testified that the horse was gentle and predictable, and that they regarded Blue as the last horse that would behave in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LairdWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Deese v. White Belt Dairy Farms, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Bradshaw v. MinterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  4. Finneran v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Kathren v. OlenikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API