Legal Opinion

Ventry v. Sands

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 6, 1996No. Nos. 95 Civ. 9633(MP), 95 Civ. 9729(MP) and 95 Civ. 10262(MP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs, purchasers of the securities of Canandaigua Wine Company, Inc. (“Canan-daigua”), have brought suit against Canan-daigua and two of its officers, Richard Sands and Lynn Fetterman, (collectively “Defendants”) asserting securities fraud claims based on §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“S.E.C.”). Plaintiffs contend that misleading statements or omissions by Canandaigua and its…

2Cases cited31 opinions

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

In Re Canandaigua Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996