Legal Opinion
U. S. Filter Distribution Group, Inc. v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 14, 1999No. A00A0210PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Chief Judge.
We granted U. S. Filter Distribution Group, Inc.’s (“U. S. Filter”) motion for interlocutory review to determine whether the time computation method adopted in OCGA § 1-3-1 (d) (3) applies to the filing of materialman’s liens. We conclude that it does not and affirm the trial court’s denial of U. S. Filter’s motion for summary judgment.
This case involves a suit to foreclose a materialman’s lien. The record shows that Ranger Construction contracted with Jimmy Barnett and Buckeye Land & Timber Company, Inc. (“Barnett and Buckeye”), the appellees, to install a water system…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phinazee v. Interstate Nationalease, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Palmer v. Duncan Wholesale, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Womack Industries, Inc. v. B & a Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Davis v. DESA INTERNATIONAL, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- U. S. Filter Distribution Group, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Beacon Medical Products, LLC v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Parke v. FantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Ajayi v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- US Filter Distribution Group v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000