Legal Opinion

Christopher March Renick v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 17, 2025No. 6D2023-2329Published

1Opinion of the Court

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2023-2329 Lower Tribunal No. 2014-CF-004335 _____________________________ CHRISTOPHER MARCH RENICK, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. A Case of Original Jurisdiction. April 17, 2025 PER CURIAM. Christopher Renick seeks a writ of habeas corpus, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d). Renick argues that his appellate counsel was ineffective for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Kearse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Downs v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Smithers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API