Barnhill v. Coombe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCardona, P. J.
*720Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting possession of a controlled substance. After the determination of guilt was affirmed upon administrative review, petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging the determination on several grounds.*
We confirm. Even if, as petitioner claims, he was denied the right to select an employee assistant from an established list (see, 7 NYCRR 251-4.1), we nonetheless find that petitioner has waived any objection in this regard (see, Matter of Hart v Coornbe, 229 AD2d 754, 755, lv…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Di Rose v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Afrika v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Segrue v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Johnson v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ventimiglia v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Miller v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lawrence v. HeadleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Amaker v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Freeman v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Holloway v. LacyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.