Legal Opinion · Dissent

James Kershaw v. Princeton Properties Management, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 2019No. A18A1842Published

1DissentMcFadden, Presiding Judge

In vacating the trial court's judgment, the majority concludes that the trial court erred by failing to perform his gatekeeping duties under OCGA § 24-7-702 ("Rule 702"). But the record does not affirmatively show this failure, so I respectfully dissent. Instead of vacating the judgment and remanding the case to the trial court, I would reach the merits of the appeal and, as detailed below, reverse the grant of summary judgment on the claims requiring proof that the exacerbation of Mrs. Kershaw's medical condition was caused by the presence of mold or dust in the apartment.

1. Rule 702 ruling.

A…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. Mast Biosurgery USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Layfield v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. DeGolyer v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Allstate Insurance v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API