Legal Opinion

In Re Stringer's Estate

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1959No. 2871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger

Both parties have petitioned for rehearing.

Appellee charges our opinion omitted material facts; material facts were incorrectly stated; and important points of law raised were not considered.

The omitted fact is said to he that appellant three times denied there was a will. Such denial is not material to the validity of the instrument. It could not change the fact, established by competent evidence, that there was such a will. Even had appellant known there existed a last will and intended to conceal it — which does not appear to be the case — the instrument would still have been and remained…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Church v. QuinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In Re Estate of CocklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. In Re Estate of KennySupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. In Re Estate of CocklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Stringer's EstateWyoming Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API