In Re Stringer's Estate
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger
Both parties have petitioned for rehearing.
Appellee charges our opinion omitted material facts; material facts were incorrectly stated; and important points of law raised were not considered.
The omitted fact is said to he that appellant three times denied there was a will. Such denial is not material to the validity of the instrument. It could not change the fact, established by competent evidence, that there was such a will. Even had appellant known there existed a last will and intended to conceal it — which does not appear to be the case — the instrument would still have been and remained…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Church v. QuinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re Estate of CocklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- In Re Estate of KennySupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- In Re Estate of CocklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Stringer's EstateWyoming Supreme Court · 1959