Legal Opinion
State v. Holmes
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 8, 2005No. 54965-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 The Washington Supreme Court decision in City of Redmond v. Moore1 did not invalidate the crime of driving while license suspended in the third degree.1 2 Rather, it invalidated the process by which drivers have their licenses suspended in certain circumstances. Because police are not required to know whether a driver was afforded due process when his or her license was suspended in order to have probable cause to arrest a driver for driving while license suspended in the third degree, and then conduct a search subsequent to the arrest, we reverse.
Grosse, J.
FACTS
¶2 On October 9, 2003,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PotterWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CarnahanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. CarnahanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. PacasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.