Legal Opinion

Mincey v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 23, 1994No. 24075PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Acting Chief Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the denial of Elijah Mincey’s (Mincey’s) application for Post-Conviction Relief (PCR).

We reverse.

FACTS

Mincey was indicted for distribution of crack cocaine, conspiracy, and distribution within proximity of a school.

At trial, an undercover agent, Office James Rouse, testified that he and an informant, Charles Ann Chapman, went to Lin wood Street in Batesburg to make a drug buy. They drove up to a group of three or four men, one of whom approached the car. Rouse told the man he wanted to buy some crack, at which point the man…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thrift v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  5. State v. MerrimanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. OrrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Jordan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  5. William Michael Jordan v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API