Evans v. Montgomery
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
A large number of errors are assigned upon this record. The action was assumpsit for material furnished and work and labor performed in lathing and plastering a dwelling-house.
The defendant asserts that the work was done for' one John Gilpin, who had contracted to furnish materials, and do the entire work of constructing the building. As a matter of fact, this may have been true, but there was some evidence tending to substantiate plaintiff’s claim, which, under the well-settled rule, made it a question for the jury. We cannot agree with defendant’s .counsel in their claim that there was a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Gilchrist v. GilchristMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Donker v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1925