Andres v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed April 21, 2017, and published at 854 F.3d 1103, is amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
Defendants-Appellees’ petition for rehearing, filed June 2, 2017 (Dkt. 32), is denied as moot.
Appellant’s “Response to Defendant’s Appeal,” filed June 16, 2017 (Dkt. 33), is construed as an unrequested answer to the petition for panel rehearing and, as such, is ordered stricken. See Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(3) (“Unless the court requests, no answer to a petition for panel rehearing is permitted.”).
Petitions for rehearing may be filed regarding the amended…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Brown v. ValoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- McKinney v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Peter Lewis v. Odie Washington, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, Mary Nichols, Richard Gramley, Lieutenant Shaw, and Lieutenant JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Michael Rinaldi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Ramirez v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- John Fordley v. Joe LizarragaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- (PC) Ardds v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PC) Arrant v. Sacramento County JailDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.