Legal Opinion

Walton v. The Frank Gilmore

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This was a libel in rem for collision. Libelants have excepted toff “cross bill” filed by the claimants.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

Joseph Walton & Co. file this libel against the steamboat Frank Gilmore to recover $733 damages alleged to have been sustained by the sinking of their coal barge No. 457 on May 20, 1893, in a collision caused by the negligence of the Gilmore. The respondents filed a paper indorsed an “answer and cross bill.” They deny the allegations of the libel, and set up that libelants are indebted to them upon a running account in a balance of $192.93 as of June 14, 1893. They further allege that on September 12, 1890, their coal flat No. 135 and cargo was negligently sunk by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Ayres v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. The" Dove"Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. McDonald v. The Tom LysleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Dexter v. MunroeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1861

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. United Transportation & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  3. Davidson v. GreenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1904
  4. Anderson v. Pacific Coast Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API