Legal Opinion

Zahumensky v. Fandrich

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against the defendant to recover for personal injuries suffered while riding as a paying guest in the defendant’s automobile. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.

Briefly the facts are: That the plaintiff and the defendant were both plasterers employed by one B. F. Smith on work being done in Newberg, Oregon. The parties resided in the city of Portland and there was an agreement between the parties that, as each had an automobile, on the day that the party owning the automobile transported the other person, that person paid…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zeek v. BicknellOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Scott v. TorranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Howland v. BartlettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Weiss v. KohlhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Campbell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cyberco Holdings, Inc. Ex Rel. Richardson v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. ShippsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. ShippsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API