Legal Opinion

Lichtenstein v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1925No. 16377PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The defendant and Mrs. E. Lichtenstein and A. Lichtenstein were indicted for a violation of the act approved August 15, 1923, and the act amendatory thereof approved August 16, 1924, in that they “did sell at .retail one carton Chesterfield cigarettes without having attached to said carton and to the package contained therein the revenue stamp as provided by” the aforesaid acts, the payment of which tax “is required by law to be evidenced by the attachment to the carton, package and other containers the stamps herein referred to.” The indictment alleges also that “Mrs. E. Lichtenstein and A.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kimmel v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. State v. MooreheadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  3. Keller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Williams v. City of TiftonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Novak v. RedwineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ThigpenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API